The should-cost standard for OPEX.
The only firm focused solely on operating cost and the sales it drives. Oil and gas executives who know which data move buying decisions, negotiation consultants who know how to deploy it at the table, and the AI expertise to embed both in your systems.
For a decade this industry optimized how it builds wells, and it worked: drilling and completion costs are down roughly 25% since 2015.
Operating costs came down about 5%.
Running a well is not four times harder to analyze than drilling one. The optimization followed the capital, and for a decade the capital went into building wells.
That was the right order. The wells were where the money was.
It isn't anymore.
Three years of M&A moved the core of American shale onto a handful of balance sheets, and what the deals did not concentrate, the drill bit depleted.
The one merger that itemized operating costs called the line miscellaneous.
Overhead goes first, because a headquarters can cut itself. Well costs follow: bid all year, benchmarked to the decimal. The operating line sits near the footnotes.
Ask an operator whether their LOE is tight and you get a peer quartile. Their peers have no should-cost model either, so the industry is grading itself on a curve set by the ungraded.
And the bottom of that fraction is production, so great rock prints as operating competence and a tired asset prints as failure, before anyone has read a contract.
A denominator does not occur in nature. So we counted the machines, and built the tool we always wanted across the table from us.
No adjacent practice this work subsidizes or competes with.
Kalibr is the only firm focused solely on operating cost and the sales that ride on it. Behind it sit three backgrounds pointed at one line of the income statement: executives who have made these buying decisions from the operator's seat, negotiation consultants who know which data actually close a deal and how to deploy it at the table, and AI builders who embed the read in a client's own systems instead of another dashboard.
Frac and OCTG are the second act; we prove the machine on compression first, then port it.
One census, sold the same way to everyone who reads this market. Same rows, same price, published scope. No exclusivity, no early access, no side deals. That is why an analyst can cite it and a vendor can trust it.

